Mark Weakland Literacy

  • Home
  • Services
    • Multi-day Coaching
    • Literacy Workshops
    • Title I Presentations
    • Conferences and Conventions: Speaker & Presenter
    • Author Visits for Children: Schools, Libraries, Festivals
    • Clients and Testimonials
  • Teacher Books & Materials
  • Kid's Books & More
  • Blog
  • File Cabinet
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Services
    • Multi-day Coaching
    • Literacy Workshops
    • Title I Presentations
    • Conferences and Conventions: Speaker & Presenter
    • Author Visits for Children: Schools, Libraries, Festivals
    • Clients and Testimonials
  • Teacher Books & Materials
  • Kid's Books & More
  • Blog
  • File Cabinet
  • About
  • Contact

Text for Teaching Beginning Readers: Real, Connected, Authentic, Decodable

7/27/2020

2 Comments

 
Picture
I was contacted recently by a Title I coordinator with a question: “What is meant by real, connected text?” The coordinator, currently working with her teachers to research and then restructure their district’s reading interventions, asked the question with regards to a point made by  David Kilpatrick in his 2015 book, Essentials of Assessing, Preventing, and Overcoming Reading Difficulties, namely, and I’m paraphrasing here, that effective reading interventions share the following:
  1. They teach phonemic awareness skills to an advanced level,
  2. They explicitly and systematically teach phonics to mastery, and,
  3. They provide opportunities to read real, connected text (authentic reading).

Because reading research tells us “the components of effective reading instruction are the same whether the focus is prevention or intervention” (Foorman & Torgesen, 2001), we know Kilpatrick’s trio is just as important to classroom reading instruction as it is to reading interventions. But what, exactly, is meant by real, connected text? How much time should students be given to read it? And in what settings are the various types of text appropriate? I’ll tackle the first question this week and the last two later in August.

What is real, connected text?
Defining educational terms is challenging. Our field seems to constantly create, redefine, and deconstruct its vocabulary but rarely discards any of it. Still, I’ll try to give a definition, starting with the “connected” part of the phrase.

I take connected to mean multiple sentences, contiguous on a page or presented over pages, relating to each other in ways that ultimately tell a story or present cohesive information. These sentences, a.k.a. connected text, can be found in:
  • Beginning readers that present one or more sentences on a page,
  • Picture books with one or more sentences per page,
  • Articles (of one page or more) with multiple sentences within paragraphs,
  • Fiction or informational books, presented in chapters or not, with multiple sentences in multiple paragraphs over many pages, 
  • All of the above but in digital form.

Authentic text
Unlike the term “real text,” authentic text has been repeatedly defined by others. Here’s what the Florida Department of Education, which says: “Authentic text may be thought of as any text that was written and published for the public… written for “real world” purposes and audiences: to entertain, inform, explain, guide, document or convince” (FLDOE, 2020). Educators like Scott Thornbury and Lesley Morrow also weigh in, saying “…text is authentic if it was originally written for a non-classroom audience” and “[authentic text is a] stretch of real language produced by a real speaker or writer for a real audience and designed to convey a real message” (Thornbury, 2008; Morrow, 1977).

An example of text most would classify as authentic is Nancy Shaw’s entertaining Sheep in a Jeep, a picture book featuring simple sentences of varying structure; colorful, active illustrations; a plethora of phonic patterns; and a variety of engaging verbs (go, yelp, push, grunt, shove, leap, splash, thud, shout, cheer) which provide the reader with, as Catherine Snow puts it, “rare and sophisticated” vocabulary. Although teachers and parents can use this text to expose children to language and teach concepts (sequence, verbs, using context to gain meaning, and so forth), the book was not originally written with teaching in mind. 

Definers of "authentic text" often go beyond books to classify blogs, novels, pop songs, newspaper articles, recipes, and road signs as authentic. Some also include radio shows, podcasts, photos, and video clips as examples. For me, podcasts and video clips won’t contribute much to teaching students the fundamentals of how to read written words and so I’ll put them aside. And while environmental text certainly helps children understand that text is an integral part of the world, I don’t think it is a central tool of K-3 reading instruction. So, in the end, I define connected, authentic text as text 1) that features connected sentences over one or more pages, 2) is not created for instructional purposes, and 3) is one of the main tools for fundamental reading instruction, K-3. Varieties of text that work within this general definition are poems and rhymes, picture books of all kinds, and chapter books, simple and more advanced, both narrative and informational. Once again, many of these types of texts can exist in digital format although I think the science of how well digital text works to teach reading is still in its infancy (and there are many unanswered questions).

A broader definition of “real and connected”
My sense is that Kilpatrick’s real and connected is a bigger category than authentic. Thus, in the file drawer labeled "real and connected," I’ll include books written specifically to help children learn how to read. Here I am thinking of the leveled books and predictable (pattern) books often used in kindergarten and 1st grade instruction.
 
Leveled text
Unlike authentic text, leveled readers are written with instruction in mind. Typically they support young readers with controlled vocabulary, a measured number of words in a sentence, and sometimes a repetitive sentence structure. For example, the first four pages of an early leveled reader might be this:

Picture
Picture
These types of books also fold in supports typically associated with picture books, such as photographs and illustrations. Also like authentic books, these texts present children with multiple, relating sentences in a book form (with title, cover art, and illustrations) that often tells a story or gives topical information. Finally, I’ve found that young children are excited when they finish one of these contrived texts and the excitement that springs from their reading success is a very real thing.

Picture
​​Text written with teaching in mind
Other pieces of text I categorize as “real and connected” are the informational articles and short, fictional stories found on sites like Readworks.org. Specifically authored for a website or program, these passages are written with reading levels and teachable content in mind. Like leveled readers, they typically have measured vocabulary loads, controlled sentence structure, and confined sentence lengths. Even with their constrained writing, these informational passages and short stories seem real to me (and almost authentic) because they closely follow text forms (newspaper articles, short stories in magazines) that are written without instruction in mind.

Is decodable text real?
Writers create decodable text with a narrow teaching focus in mind: giving beginning readers practice in breaking the code through carefully constructed sentences that use a small number of phonic patterns. The construction of decodable text consistently points students towards the strategies of “look at the letters,” “look for patterns” and “sound out the word.” This is why decodable sentences and paragraphs are an important part of many curriculums, such as Barton Reading and Wilson Reading among others, that aim to help students who have dyslexia. By using a limited number of phonic patterns, decodable text gives students who need it more repetition and distributed practice in phonic decoding, and fosters literacy development by helping beginning readers build detailed and accurate replicas of patterns and words in neural circuitry (Shaywitz, 2020; Duke, 2019). 

Picture
​Because decodable text is written by authors who use very narrow parameters to accomplish a specific task, some may see it as the opposite of real or authentic. But I’d say it becomes more real and authentic if it makes sense as a story and builds topical, background, and vocabulary knowledge (Hiebert, 2020). In my mind, the best example of highly controlled text that is real, connected, and perhaps even authentic is  Dr. Suess’s Green Eggs and Ham. After using only 225 different words to tell the tale of The Cat in the Hat, Suess’s editor bet him he couldn’t write another book using fewer. He did, using only 50 words to write Green Eggs and Ham. A classic in the world of children’s literature, this highly controlled text features memorable characters, humor, conflict, resolution, and character growth.

Use it all to read, read, read
In the end, all of this might be mere semantics. The big idea is to get kids to read, read, read!  No matter what text you have available, do your best to program opportunities for children to read. It's best when students are reading everything and anything, from traffic signs and recipes to poems, website articles, graphic novels, and picture books. Give more support for those who need it. For example, if some students need more practice in breaking the code, give them additional opportunities to read decodable text. But don’t forget to also give them rich, authentic children’s literature. Support all students through read alouds and a kick butt classroom library laid out in browsing bins. No one type of text will teach all children to read and certainly you can’t teach all children with only one reading textbook!
 
In my next blog I’ll discuss programming time to read all types of text, every day and for long periods of time.
 
Sources / Citations
  • Kilpatrick, D. (2015). The Essentials of Assessing, Preventing, and Overcoming Reading Difficulties. Wiley & Sons.
  • Foorman, B. & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical Elements of Classroom and Small-Group Instruction Promote Reading Success in All Children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 16(4), 203-212.
  • Florida Department of Education, retrieved July 20, 2020 from www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7581/urlt/AuthenticText.pdf
  • Thornbury, S. (2006) An A-Z of ELT: A Dictionary of Terms and Concepts Used in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Macmillan. (p. 21).
  • Morrow, K. (1977). “Authentic Texts and ESP.” In Holden, S. (ed.). English for Specific Purposes. Modern English Publications. In Edublog. https://edublog.scholastic.com/post/all-children-deserve-access-authentic-text 
  • Shawitz, S. & Shaywitz, J. (2020). Overcoming Dyslexia: Second Edition, Completely Revised and Updated Revised. Knopf.
  • Duke, N. (2019). Quoted in What Research Really Says About Teaching Reading (Even Beyond ILA 2019). Retrieved 10/28/19 from www.literacyworldwide.org/blog/literacy-daily/2019/10/22/
  • Blevins, W. (2020) Quoted in ‘Decodable’ Books: Boring, Useful, or Both? Schwartz, S. (2020). Education Week, March 13, 2020.
  • Hiebert, A. (2020). Quoted in ‘Decodable’ Books: Boring, Useful, or Both? Schwartz, S. (2020). Education Week, March 13, 2020.

2 Comments
Diane frommer
1/1/2021 04:18:50 pm

Just ‘discovered’ your blog when searching for a simple explanation of Seidenberg’s reading triangle- enjoyed your explanation. However, in light of your obviously acceptance of what research tells us about teaching reading, I am curious about your opinion of using level texts,like the ones shown above, with beginning readers. I know of no other way for children to ‘read’ most of these other than reliance upon using pictures, and context to ‘guess’ words as well as the necessity of children having acquired some high frequency worlds as sight words perhaps through whole word memorization, as othrographic mapping would likely be very partially developed at the point in which children would be using this book. Although the particular text shown has fewer non- phonically decodable words than many other leveled readers (if I recall it contains the word bird, tree, as well as high frequency words such as come, comes, looking, ...) To me, leveled readers lend themselves to use of the three cueing system. . Further, it seemed you recommended limited use of decodable readers- perhaps ‘limited’ implies that they should be used as stepping stone, not that their use should be limited with beginning readers in the first few months. I’d welcome your comments. I am a teacher who works with beginning readers and have considerably altered my approach in recent years away from leveled readers to decodables, influenced by my interpretation of research on reading. It would be great to read your thoughts.

Reply
Mark Weakland link
1/2/2021 06:26:17 am

Diane - Thank you for your thoughtful and insightful comments, as well as the chance to have dialogue around the ideas presented in my blog. I totally agree that traditionally constructed leveled readers "ask" students to rely on pictures, context, and text. And so we have to integrate new understandings of how the reading brain works when we use leveled books for instruction. This is why some of your comments, and I'm paraphrasing here, really resonated with me: "...considerably altering an approach away from leveled readers to decodables, influenced by an interpretation of research on reading,"

My concept of reading instruction is not binary and so I wouldn't eliminate leveled readers from my instruction. But I would keep in mind these teaching ideas: 1) Don't use leveled readers exclusively. Rather, make sure to include decodable text. And for some children, diminish the use of leveled readers greatly and go with more decodable text. 2) When using leveled readers and talking to students about what "word attack" strategies to use, first stress "using letters and sounds," "noticing patterns," and "reading through the whole word (look at every letter, read to the end)." Then, go to meaning (Does your word make sense, does that sound like language, is there a word that sounds like what you read and makes sense, etc.). And 3) carefully pick leveled readers. Weed out the ones that include too many complex words (and thus force children to mostly rely on picture cues, repeated patterns, etc) . Conversely, favor those that use more partly- or mostly- decodable words.

Finally, I don't read my post as arguing for a limited use of decodable readers. Rather, I agree with this comment you made: decodable readers "... should be used as stepping stones, not that their use should be limited with beginning readers in the first few months." I have many thoughts about what "stepping stone" instruction might look. Also, I'm very curious about 1) what kind of results you are seeing with your new "altered approach away from leveled text" and 2) how these results compare to results obtained by your old approach. But I think I'll stop here! Thanks again for the chance to discuss these ideas (love it!) and wishing you the best in your teaching.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Mark Weakland

    I am a teacher,  literacy consultant, author, musician, nature lover, and life long learner.

    Subscribe

    * indicates required


    ​Archives

    January 2023
    June 2022
    May 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Mark Weakland Literacy                                                                                                                                           © 2023 Mark Weakland Literacy
Hollsopple, PA 15935   
mark@markweaklandliteracy.com